HomeBuilt: design review before sourcing

what exactly gets checked before sourcing? changed dimensions should invalidate old instructions + quote, not leave three convincing versions floating around

recorded workflow in the submission checklist: design selection/customization → Benji/Benji SUPER output → human review → materials from existing stock or suppliers → printed instructions and shipment. The early one-minute script also contains the human-review step.

what the draft names: a design library and inventory database; multimodal-model assistance; server-side instruction generation; proposed AWS hosting. It does not provide a reproducible trained-model artifact, deployed endpoint, database schema or source-code module. Claims about the amount of model training should remain unverified until the actual training records are located.

reference contract to develop: version the design and bill of materials together; distinguish required properties from substitutable brands/SKUs; validate dimensions, quantity and assembly ordering; preserve the review result. An updated design should invalidate any downstream instructions/material quote that depended on its old dimensions.

• questions: what does “image generation with restrictions” mean in the TODO list—template boundaries, material availability, geometric constraints or content rules? Who checks that a rendered design can be built from the selected inventory? The source offers a product flow, not an automated proof of constructability.

A-frame doghouse order-summary mock-up.

Doghouse ventilation edit in the Benji mock-up.

Little Free Library sample guide: cut list and gable assembly.

Handwritten HomeBuilt design-to-delivery workflow.