TractX reading shelf: ambiguity, density and validation

reading pile: bottlenecks / false positives / FBC / phantom validation
question to come back to — what ambiguity survives even when the synthetic example looks convincing?

• Saved readings worth keeping next to the implementation:

• Bottleneck issue / multi-bundle fixels: use as the starting reference for why multiple bundles can share one voxel orientation.
• The challenge of mapping the human connectome: benchmark definitions and the false-positive problem.
• Quantitative streamlines tractography: saved normalization/FBC reference.
• Fixel-based fiber density and morphology: connect the density representation to the quantities being estimated.
• Physical/digital phantoms for tractography validation: keep synthetic ground truth and real-data validation separate.

• These URLs were recovered from the project's Research Links, not independently re-reviewed here. Follow-up question from this reading list: when association improves under a synthetic phantom's assumptions, which ambiguities remain intrinsically unresolved in real diffusion data? This is a current reference question, not a result.

TractX bibliography and figure credits.